On the first Thursday of April 2021, and after more than ten years after the Syrian war, a senior Russian official declares (according to Al-Sharq Al-Awsat newspaper) that the Syrian crisis is in a state of freezing, with these simple and few words clearly declaring what the current situation is, the Russians succeeded and through their military intervention in directly freezing of the disintegration of the regime in Damascus.
At the end of 2015, in a press conference for the Russian president on Syria, he explained the reasons for direct military intervention in Syria, and talks about terrorism and the potential terrorist dangers that could affect Russia without direct mention of the regime in Damascus.
At the end of 2019, Russians achieved their goals of preserving order, and the successive and deliberate acquisition of gains and influence in Syria, and the conclusion of large arms deals outside Syria, thanks to its experience in battles there, along with the Syrian army and against terrorism, as it was claimed, the Russians crowned their military strategy and directed the political path, in accordance with Russian policy in the whole region of the Middle East; so it can be a Russian success.
In March of this year, many writers poured out many opinion articles dealing with the perpetual Syrian murder and tried to reach the full reasons behind the political stubbornness. In a quick look at all the political initiatives, both Arab and international, that were proposed for the sake of the Syrian solution, the position of the Syrian Ba'ath government was to refuse and maneuvering, meaning he did not pay any attention to any initiative from them, while he always insisted on his only vision of stability, which is the surrender of the opposing parties to him and present them with the banner of loyalty.
While certain people took advantage of the great support from the Friends of Syria group; Whether states or organizations, to reach political positions in the bodies of the opposition, and here a stark turning point in the course of opposition political action began, from forming inter-blocs and creating plots to stay in positions and harness their resources according to improper desires and intentions.
The lawyer Adwar Hamshah, said that the solution in the end, must be in accordance with the American vision, and that the American solution is still far away.
The writer Yunus Al-Sayed said: "Turkey wants to have a major role in any future negotiations, this matter is consistent with what a German journalist mentioned about a Turkish veto on any Kurdish presence in the Syrian peace negotiations".
On his part, Abdel-Wahab Badrakhan reminds us of tens of thousands of detainees and their absent fate, while his compatriot Ziad Ghosn sheds light on the great political and military changes in the Middle East as consequences of the bloody Syrian scene.
In another quick look at the opinions of many writers, we find that they are still chanting their empty phrases about the conspiracy without thinking for a moment that there is a great sin that they must admit.
The Syrian opposition after the Syrian event differs in terms of molding and alliance from the democratic and popular structure of the opposition shortly after the second half of the last century, and even in some figures, as it became evident or in other terms, it now expresses the truth of its true ideas and visions after decades of talks.
Whoever hears the speeches of some of them in the seventies and eighties of the last century and their talk about democracy, sustainable solutions, and the legal construction of state institutions, will be deeply shocked when he hears from the same persons direct sectarian expressions towards the components of Syria, and even tries to convince (the revolutionary people) that the policy of that state and its interference in the Syrian War was with divine blessing and angelic patronage, and it only intervened to support and protect the people, and it knew the subtleties of matters more than the people themselves.
The extent of the difference between this discourse and the vision of the opposition and its emergence no longer coincides or converges in anything, as the international intervention in the Syrian affairs in favor of the regime or the opposition is now emerging a similar regime or opposition discourse in terms of defending allies and justifying its intervention and crushing the other side, in the equation of its disbursement; It only serves the international agenda.
As for the politicians of the neighborhood and the intervening countries, they sell us an illusion, as their whims are always matched by Syrian politicians who are fooled by the rulers and the opposition, and the latest of those naive statements by the Russian Deputy Minister of Diplomacy, that the humanitarian situation in areas outside of Damascus’s control is very bad. To the extent that the ministers of Damascus have to intervene and find solutions.
The Syrian army and its allied forces, have also set the military rhythm according to the directives of the Russians and Iranians.
The SDF and the Autonomous Administration in the east of the Euphrates and northeastern Syria are rejected by many regional and international countries interfering in the Syrian scene.
Mr. De Mistura is gone, and we have forgotten the long drama of the Four Dynasties, while Mr. Geir Pedersen came and began the stories of the Geneva sessions to discuss the constitution and be overwhelmed with details and gelatinous media statements.
After sessions, preparations, discussions, pouring money, holding conferences of supporters and donors, the UN envoy goes out in new press releases; That this particular tour; No results were achieved, as if the previous sessions had achieved such impressive results that the parties sat for the first time directly with each other.
From Daraa, the children set off towards the dream of the state, so that after ten years we will find Syrian people with political attire. Attending international conferences to find a solution to the Syrian murderer, but these people work like any employee in a company; That is, he receives work and operating instructions from the employer, and here the employer is the opposition or the regime.
Some of these children were killed, their memory immortalized, the country fragmented, and tens of thousands of innocent people milled between the wounds of war and military merchants.
It is assumed here that it matches the logic exhausted from war and contemplated from a bitter decade. Finding a solution from the clutches of the international community, which is supposed to lead the current political process in Geneva; According to the management of the international community, to a peaceful solution to the Syrian dilemma.
Returning to the political track, and the meetings of the Constitutional Committee, which did not inform us until the moment about a point of agreement, even one of value, we did not hear from the members about the usefulness of discussions and their adoption of human rights, agreed upon by people in this world regardless of their different backgrounds. We have not heard from this committee about a logical time frame that leads to a just and consensual solution for the homeless or displaced persons burdened by the pain of war.
Syria; From its north to its south, from its Sunnis to its atheists, from its Arabs to its Armenians, it must first and foremost seek basic consensus for coexistence, not a constitution that meets the desires of populist leaders or hired politicians.
According to my point of view, any peaceful political solution to the Syrian crisis or just to the Syrian murderer collides with the conflict of interests of the countries interfering in the Syrian scene, as the Turks justify their interference with international humanitarian law, while the Russians and Iranians justify the request of the (legitimate) Ba'ath government for their intervention.
Perhaps we Syrians need an effort more than just convincing the populist leaders interfering in the Syrian event of the need for a peaceful and consensual Syrian solution, that dispels the concerns of the Syrian components, as we must first work to convince the main Syrian parties themselves. To end the ordeal and start building a modern and democratic Syria.
The current blockade will not lead to a political solution; Because the Ba'ath government simply will not feel the tragedies of the citizens, the opposition benefits from the continuation of the current situation by maintaining its institutions and its international standing as one of the potential representatives of the Syrian people.
Even if the Constitutional Committee fulfills its tasks and prepared a consensual constitution between the opposition institution and the Ba'ath government, this will be at the expense of the Kurds, excluding them and denying other minorities their national and religious rights. There is still a long way to go to reach a peaceful, conciliatory.
COMMENTS